Ha ha haaaaaa!! You’re all wrong!!! Well, technically you’re
absolutely spot on. The typewriter is mechanically, cosmetically and physically
a Remington Noiseless 7, aside from the fact that it
says Underwood Noiseless 77 on the back plate. The fact that so many of you
could simply look at the box alone and tell me what was inside is very very
impressive indeed! Although in saying that, the fact that no one mentioned the
possibility of an Underwood 77 does provide me with just a tiny tiny little bit
of satisfaction!
You’re also spot on in that it arrived unscathed. This was largely due to the sturdy clasp things that hold it to the case. Inside the box was just these token couple
of bits of scrunched up of newspaper which would have done almost nothing if
one of the clasp things had have failed on its voyage from hot, dry
Cathedral City, CA.
But I’m stoked to own this shiny old Underwood Noiseless 77
Serial Number 844407. I have no idea what things it’s been up to in the
last 77 years, but I don’t think typing is one of them. It seems like its almost
brand new, which was a big selling point. Pretty much all my typewriters up to this
point have been a bit beaten up or scruffy or rusty needing repair or all of these
things simultaneously. So inspired by Ken's recent post on his "like new" Olympia SM5, I really was
keen on finding something that looked, smelt and worked like it had just left
the factory. Owning a machine with the noiseless mechanism had also been on my
wish list. I saw the noiseless mechanism in the flesh for the first time at the
Brisbane Type-In early last month, where John showed me how it worked. I found
and still find it fascinating how it works and will look forward to searching
for information as to why it wasn’t more enduringly popular. The fact that this
typewriter is as common as the rain doesn’t bother me either, as spare parts
will be easier to come by if I need them and this time around I was definitely
after sparkle rather than rarity. Achieving both these things simultaneously
can be rather too painful on the old hip pocket...
The only slight gripe I have with the transaction is that the seller listed
typewriter as “mint” condition, which it certainly is cosmetically.
But by “mint” I perhaps optimistically assumed it would be working in mint condition too which it’s
not and I didn't bother to ask. The ribbon vibrator wasn’t holding the ribbon properly and needed minor attention with long-nosed pliers and the paper rollers are all but square. These will require
replacing if I can find the right ones, or otherwise a bit of boiling or gaffer
tape or all of the above. The keys are a tad sticky and the print doesn’t seem
completely even, however I’ll find out for sure whether this is an issue or not
once I replace the ribbon as this one is pretty dead. This certainly isn't anything major though and theres nothing wrong with a bit repair tho. It will be a little bit scary mind you, as it’s one thing to work
on a beaten up cheap typewriter, but it’s a little more daunting
working on something which reflects your face as you work on it and looks a new car (even if it does smell like a musty
attic). This may be a job for Monday...